yes, I meant acronyms.
Yes, I know you did. Hence the title of this newly created thread not stating "...and Anagram...".
Should we downgrade the English language just because it鈥檚 part of the 鈥檆urrent vernacular鈥?
You're making an a priori argument/assumption that the use of casual everyday language in these threads is some sort of "downgrade". How so? An argument could easily be made that a language is upgraded聽 by allowing its naturally organic structure to evolved, not by it being trellised.
English speakers should be encouraging correct and full English...
I assume this is with regard to the use of abbreviations as mentioned in your post, "A note to all respondents for all subjects...". Surely you're not suggesting that instead of "wi-fi" we use wireless standard IEEE 802.11, for "e.g." we use exempli gratia, or for "etc" we use et cetera, etc etc. Common acronyms would of course include "FBI", "WHO", "UN", "EU" and on and on.
I had asked you which member's post(s) had prompted your request that members refrain from using abbreviations and anagrams, but received no reply. Am I correct in assuming that it was the post from member goodolboy聽 where he said, "Just arrived back this morning CDG to SGN & entered on the 45 days visa exempt", (Link) as the reason for your post? I wrote in reply, "Should the need arise, members are encouraged to ask for clarification from the OP where a simple Google search did not suffice." Here are the Google search results for "" (Link).
...especially in a foreign culture where proper English is difficult enough...
But, this forum is not "a foreign culture". It is the expat.com/Vietnam/English forum, an English language forum dedicated to helping expats in Vietnam. Again, members are always encouraged to ask for clarification of any post they have difficulty understanding. The forum is definitely not an ESL training site, and participants are expected to be literate in English. Fluency is not a prerequisite.
without adding to confusion with lazy texting.
Describing the use of abbreviations and acronyms as "lazy texting" is derogatory and a sleight against, what I would venture to be, the majority of internet users.
Are we really in such a hurry to respond or ask questions, that we can鈥檛 use the King鈥檚 English?
It's not about speed, it is most often simply a way to reduce the number of keystrokes.
It鈥檚 bad enough that we all make typo鈥檚 -聽 again hitting send without reading what we鈥檝e written, and I鈥檓 guilty of that on occasion.
Ditto, of course.
I make a point of not using abbreviations or acronyms in my texts or emails. As an English teacher I try to always set an example. My grammar isn鈥檛 perfect, but I teach pronunciation rather than grammar except to correct tenses in conversations. I see many examples of poor grammar, which I attribute to English as a second language.
That is both commendable, and of course your own choice.
If English is your first language,聽 please consider that for many readers it might not be, and take the time to help them鈥 馃檪聽 聽 -@TaurusTiger
At the risk of repeating myself, it is my sincere hope that should any member be confused by or not fully understand another member's post that they reach out to the forum for clarification. Lots of friendly folk at expat.com are ready to help. Don't be shy.
Abbreviations and acronyms will be encountered almost daily in the real world. Non-native English speaking members being exposed to these on expat.com will hopefully expand the member's understanding of the modern English language (whether this is an upgrade or a downgrade is of course subjective).
馃愤1 member reacted to this post